Governor Phil Scott Announces Action On H.107, Details Progress Towards Voluntary Paid Family And Medical Leave

31 January 2020

Montpelier, Vt. – Governor Phil Scott today announced he will move forward with his voluntary paid family and medical leave program, and vetoed H.107, a bill which levied a $29 million payroll tax on Vermont workers to fund a mandatory paid leave program. 

“I share the goal to provide a program that allows workers time to take care of family and personal health needs, and to bond with new children,” said Governor Scott. “That’s why my administration has advocated for, and acted on, a voluntary paid family and medical leave plan.”

The Governor’s veto message (included below) outlines his objection to raising a $29 million payroll tax on all Vermont workers. He also outlined concerns that the bill didn’t account for all costs to establish and administer a new state benefit and bureaucracy.

Governor Scott believes the state can work towards the same goal by starting with a voluntary program that doesn’t rely on a payroll tax. His voluntary plan is already moving forward, having reached an agreement with the Vermont State Employees Union to provide a paid family and medical leave benefit to state employees and using this 8,500-member pool to create an affordable family and medical leave insurance option. 

The state is currently seeking insurance providers through a competitive bidding process. The selected insurer will not only provide paid family and medical leave coverage to state employees, it will also be required to make the coverage available for purchase by Vermont employers and individuals at a rate comparable to the state rate.   

“My administration’s approach is voluntary for employers and employees. It can be accomplished more efficiently, affordably and quickly, without a $29 million payroll tax that Vermont workers simply should not be burdened with, and without putting the risk of underfunding on taxpayers,” he added. 

The Governor’s veto message to the Legislature is included below:

“Pursuant to Chapter II, Section 11 of the Vermont Constitution, I am returning H.107, An act relating to paid family leave, without my signature because of my objections described herein:

“Reversing our demographic crisis and the negative economic impacts it is creating across the state, is the only way to ensure we can continue to invest in essential services and shared priorities, such as a more expansive paid family and medical leave program. We must not pass, and I will not support, legislation that worsens the affordability challenges and regional economic inequity in our state. 

“I share the goal to provide a program that allows workers time to take care of family and personal health needs, and to bond with new children. That’s why my administration has advocated for, and acted on, a voluntary paid family and medical leave plan. 

“Our approach is voluntary for employers and employees. It can be accomplished more efficiently, affordably and quickly, without a $29 million payroll tax that Vermont workers simply should not be burdened with, and without putting the risk of underfunding on taxpayers. 

“This voluntary plan is already moving forward. We’ve come to an agreement with the Vermont State Employees Union to provide state employees with a paid family and medical leave benefit. This allows us to create an 8,500-member base to establish an affordable family and medical leave insurance option for all Vermonters. 

“We’ve issued a request for proposals (RFP) for insurance companies to bid on covering state employees as of July 1, 2020. The successful bidder will also be required to make the coverage available for Vermont employers and individuals at a rate comparable to the state-rate. And, we expect to be able to make it available at least a year before H.107 is projected to provide benefits to Vermonters.  

“This approach gives the state flexibility, and we could always add to it, or even make it mandatory in the future if deemed necessary. But we’ll have a stronger foundation and tested administrative structure to build on. I truly believe this is an approach that will make this important benefit available to Vermonters more quickly, and is a more economically and fiscally responsible – lower cost – path to getting where the Legislature proposes to go in H.107. Importantly, it doesn’t require a $29 million payroll tax that we all know could grow. 

“My objections to H.107 also extend beyond the tax on workers. H.107 creates a cumbersome bureaucracy with the potential for long-term administrative issues and costs for the Departments of Tax (Tax), Labor (VDOL) and Financial Regulation (DFR) – and the program as a whole. No other program in state government is simultaneously administered by three different Departments, as H.107 proposes for this program. And H.107 fails to take into account increased administrative costs at Tax and DFR, and underestimates the costs at VDOL, which will add to pressures on the General Fund.

“For years, Vermonters have made it clear they don’t want, nor can they afford, new broad-based taxes. We cannot continue to make the state less affordable for working Vermonters and more difficult for employers to employ them – even for well-intentioned programs like this one. Vermonters can’t afford for us to get this wrong, especially at their expense.   

“Based on the objections outlined above, I cannot support this legislation and must return it without my signature pursuant to Chapter II, Section 11 of the Vermont Constitution.”

 

Contact Information

Office of Governor Phil Scott
109 State Street, Pavilion
Montpelier, VT 05609
Phone: 802 828-3333 (TTY: 800 649-6825)
Fax: 802 828-3339

Public Records Database and Agency Records Officer or Liaison Contact Information

Connect with us

Twitter icon
Facebook icon
RSS icon